Showing posts with label proposed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label proposed. Show all posts

Friday, June 10, 2011

Health Department Backs Off Total Ban On E-cigarettes

After hearing from the public about its proposed ban on e-cigarettes in all public places in the county, the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department has backed off – at least slightly.

At its meeting Wednesday, the Board of Health will consider a revised regulation that would still ban "vaping" in many public places, but would make exceptions for "public places where minors are lawfully prohibited, places of employment that are not public places and retail outlets that exclusively sell or promote electronic smoking cigarettes devices."

In a press release on its website, the department acknowledges the comments from vapers who use the e-cigarettes as a way to quit or cut down on smoking cigarettes.

We still believe there is a lack of hard data to assure the public that e-cigarettes are safe for the user and bystanders, but at the same time we acknowledge that there is a similar lack of data that they are in fact harmful. While the scientific and regulatory communities will surely examine the safety of e-cigarettes for many years, we feel it is still appropriate to advance regulations that prudently protect the public from a risk that is not fully quantified.

The department still recommends a total ban on sales of e-cigarettes to minors.

Read on to view the full press release from the Health Department.

The Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department’s mission is to safeguard and enhance the health of the communities of Pierce County. As part of its mission, the Health Department tackles emerging health risks through policy, programs and treatment in order to protect public health.

On May 4, 2011, the Health Department commenced a public process to collect feedback on two pieces of proposed cigarettes regulations. This is the same process used to seek community input and provide it to the Board of Health before any regulations are implemented. For this matter, input was received via email, an online form and at the public meetings that took place on May 16 and 18, 2011.

The community was actively engaged in the issue, focusing primarily on the proposed e-cigarette regulations. We are very pleased with the level of engagement from the community, and appreciate the public discourse that has taken place thus far. Several themes emerged from the public feedback. They are:

* As a whole, the community agrees with and appreciates the changes implemented as a result of the Smoking in Public Places law enacted in 2005. They appreciate that dangerous secondhand smoke cigarettes is no longer present in public places, both for health and aesthetic reasons, and support the proposed Chapter 8 regulations.

* Generally, the public agrees with the provision of Chapter 9 regulating the sale to and use of e-cigarettes by minors. Overwhelmingly, commentators stated that e-cigarettes are used primarily by adults trying to quit a smoking cigarettes habit.

* Most of the commentators shared personal stories about e-cigarettes and how they have contributed to their success at quitting smoking cigarettes or dramatically reducing the amount of cigarettes that they smoke. Due to their personal success, they feel that banning e-cigarettes in public places counteracts and interrupts their current success, and possibly discourages other smokers from attempting to quit.

The Health Department staff and leadership listened carefully to the feedback and took it into consideration. We still believe there is a lack of hard data to assure the public that e-cigarettes are safe for the user and bystanders, but at the same time we acknowledge that there is a similar lack of data that they are in fact harmful. While the scientific and regulatory communities will surely examine the safety of e-cigarettes for many years, we feel it is still appropriate to advance regulations that prudently protect the public from a risk that is not fully quantified.

However, as a result of the feedback we received, we believe it is appropriate to modify the original proposed e-cigarette regulation to allow the use of e-cigarettes in the following places:

* Public places where minors are lawfully prohibited,

* Places of employment that are not public places, and

* Retail outlets that exclusively sell or promote electronic smoking cigarettes devices


Review the full regulation.

Over the next two years, we will continue to gauge public concern over e-cigarette use, available scientific data and information about the production and marketing of e-cigarettes. We will provide the Board of Health with a report on these issues so that they can reconsider this regulation in two years or earlier, if new evidence is found.

We are pleased at the outcome of the process, and believe the proposed regulation advances the health of the people of Pierce County. These two proposed regulations are scheduled for discussion and a vote at the June 1 Board of Health meeting.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Rejected Plan For Smoke Shop

A smoke shop at Raley’s Town Centre is a threat to families and children, and is not the right business for a future downtown — at least that’s the consensus from the Planning Commission — who unanimously rejected allowing a smoke shop to move into one of the shopping center’s vacancies Thursday night.



“I’d like to bring to commission’s attention that the proposed use is in the regional commercial district that allows for tobacco stores under our zoning ordinance by conditional approval,” said Marilyn Ponton, the city’s planning and building manager. “Therefore the proposed use is appropriate use at this location.”



The plans put the smoke shop, called Fair Haven Tobacco Store, in between Tonayan Mexican Restaurant, Advance America, a check cashing store and Kragen Auto Supply. The store proposed sell items such as sunglasses, lighters, rings, scales, grinders, vaporizers, candles, hookahs, tobacco, pipes and cigars.



The Commission wanted clarification on whether or not skateboards would be sold inside, or if tobacco paraphernalia would be displayed in front windows — both dangers to kids under 18, and a clear violation of the city’s municipal code, they said.



Ponton and business owners stressed that any pipes, grinders or vaporizers would be sold behind the counter, and that skateboards would not be sold at the proposed location.



“We approved one of these type of stores about a year ago,” Ponton said.



Rohnert Park currently has two tobacco stores, Holy Smokes at 6650 Commerce Blvd., behind McDonalds, and Discount Cigarettes, at 1451 Southwest Blvd., in University Square.



“While I support free enterprise and have voted for another tobacco store … it’s clearly a family center, with a clothing store, with a supermarket, with restaurants, with numerous other businesses that cater not only to families but to a large degree children,” said Commissioner John Borba. “It’s clearly not for smoking tobacco products.”



Commissioners David Armstrong, Gerard Giudice and Susan Haydon agreed. Susan Adams was out sick.



“This is not the type of business we want in our emerging downtown,” Haydon said. “It is the heart of the city, which is emerging with our library and public services and our very popular Farmers Market — this is becoming our central downtown; that is my main concern.”



“I’m not really that surprised,” said Tareq Airehani, the would-be store owner. “We’ll work on it.”



Giudice said he would vote in favor of the store, but in the end, vetoed it.



“I know a lot of people that smoke cigarettes, but scales, grinders, vaporizers … bongs … are not involved in the process,” he said. “I’m prepared to vote in favor of this, but as the director of SCAYD, as a community activist, as a Rotarian, I spend a lot of time and a lot of money helping to avert, to stop some of the blight that a lot of this stuff that you’re going to sell causes.”



“But I support free enterprise,” Giudice said.



Ponton said Airehani can veto the Commission's decision. The tobacco store proposal would then be taken to the City Council.